Rationale for Cancellation of Library Resource
November 16, 2016
Title of resource: Microlog
Cost of resource: $44,340 per year
Reasons for Cancellation:
This product is only available in an outmoded and difficult to use format (microfiche). As a result, the cost-per-use of this product is very high i.e. an expensive product which is only rarely used. There is some overlap and duplication between the content published on this platform and public documents which are made freely available on Canadian government websites (federal, provincial, municipal and non-profit organizations). As well, there is significant overlap between Microlog and the Canadian Public Policy Collection which the Library still subscribes to.
Date Access Will Cease:
The Library subscribes to the Canadian Public Policy Collection of online reports from policy, social, economic and political institutes and think tanks, along with a selection of federal and provincial government documents
Many of the documents published in Microlog are also published online or in print by various levels of Canadian government
Searching by title or keyword in the Library’s Primo catalogue (or on Google Scholar) will help to locate alternate and publicly available versions of these documents.
If you have any questions or concerns, please contact: Scott Gillies, Head, Information Resources Team at firstname.lastname@example.org
General Criteria for Cancellation of Electronic Resources
Cancellation decisions are in most cases based on one or more of the following criteria:
Cost: The inflationary costs of scholarly information continue to rise annually. In addition, the Library’s budget is particularly impacted by currency fluctuations (over half of the Library’s scholarly resources are paid for in U.S. funds)
Overlap: Significant content overlap with other Library resources
Usage: Past usage of the resource by University of Guelph (including University of Guelph Humber) students, faculty, and staff
Scholarly need: Alignment of a resource with the University’s curricular and research programs; The scholarly importance of the resource (its centrality to the discipline and to accreditation requirements); the Library will prioritise keeping full-text (e.g. journal subscriptions) over indexes (e.g. BIOSIS, Communications Abstracts)
The decision to cancel a resource is made only after considerable discussion and exploration of alternatives - for more detailed information on the process followed, please refer to the Library’s Cancellation Policy.